Ayn Rand's Original Novel to be Published

"THERE IS NO PLACE FOR HUMOR IN A DISCUSSION THAT INVOLVES AYN RAND!" - Ayn Rand, 1979

I've learned to live without any help from Ayn Rand.

Interesting!  A blind man can live his life without braille, not knowing and understanding braille.
But once exposed can make a decision.......

Oldyfeliz wrote:Interesting!  A blind man can live his life without Rand, not knowing and understanding Rand.
But once exposed, only thinks he can make a rational decision, but is still in the grips of Dunning-Kruger......

There, all fixed.

How does changing some one's quote fix things?

lunateak wrote:How does changing some one's quote fix things?

Really? I have to explain this to you? Let me help you!

Let me rephrase.... How does lying about what some one wrote helpful?

The quote function is not there so you can distort what someone else said, make what they said mean the opposite or make them sound like someone they are not. This is Inside Lakeside, not Fox News.

lunateak wrote:Let me rephrase.... How does lying about what some one wrote helpful?

It doesn't and it's against forum rules,as it should be.
Besides,there's no need to edit oldinfeliz's posts,he has always managed to make a fool of himself without anyone's help.

viajero wrote:

lunateak wrote:Let me rephrase.... How does lying about what some one wrote helpful?

It doesn't and it's against forum rules,as it should be.
Besides,there's no need to edit oldinfeliz's posts,he has always managed to make a fool of himself without anyone's help.

I was going to say, his response to my post wasn't changed, just the quote within the post of Itollefs,  which I took as a sarcastic pun made famous by the likes of Oscar Wilde and Winston Churchill.  They should have dropped oldandhappy's name.

You can mock and make fun of what people say but you can not use the quote function to make it appear as though they are the ones who said it. Some people recognize the changes and intent but others may not. It is lying, plain and simple.
If there is not a rule against changing posters' words within the quote box, there should be.

Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here.  The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?

And please notice that Viajero has extended his daily streak of calling someone a name on this forum!

Get a grip, people. Redacting a post in order to mock it, and referring to it as fixed, is a very common practice on boards such as this. You need to get out more.

ltollefs wrote:Get a grip, pendejos. Redacting a post in order to mock it, and referring to it as fixed, is a very common practice on boards such as this. You zopencos need to get out more.

Well,it might be a common practice on other boards ,but we have higher standards here.
Quote redacted by me.

Higher Standards stated by the person that calls people names ????

Eating pizza is more fun.

It's certainly more educational.

"Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here. The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?"

You're kidding, right?

Pogo wrote:"Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here.  The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?"

You're kidding, right?

Apparently not...

ltollefs wrote:

Pogo wrote:"Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here.  The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?"

You're kidding, right?

Apparently not...

OMG!  There isn't a person on Fox that could pass a test of logic. I used to use clips from the show to illustrate logical fallacies for my students. Bill O'Reilly was always the best example.

And, now you know what we are dealing with here.

Pogo wrote:"Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here.  The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?"

You're kidding, right?

There are people who are guided in life by their own intelligence, and then there are the others who guided by, and need the help of
Fox News....hence the ratings differential.....apples and oranges.

slainte39 wrote:

There are people who are guided in life by their own intelligence, and then there are the others who guided by, and need the help of
Fox News....hence the ratings differential.....apples and oranges.

SLAINTE

Oldyfeliz wrote:Hey, Fox News is now mentioned here.  The Number One news network, , Wow!
I have always wondered why people prefer to put their faith in the other
"drink the Obama Kool Aid" networks?

And please notice that Viajero has extended his daily streak of calling someone a name on this forum!

You're an idiot. Check the ratings for CBS, NBC, and ABC news. The networks get between 7 and 10 million viewers nightly. Fox News averages about 1 million. Bill O'Reilly gets about 3 million, but Bill O'Reilly is an idiot. Sean Hannity is worse. And you and Mainecoons bring up the rear. Only morons watch Fox News.

Shall we step into the Octagon and continue this conversation?

Casi nada, why do you have to call people names? that only proves you are at a loss for a better way to state your point.