Skin Grafts

A friend of mine received 2nd degree burns on his legs. He is not diabetic, he has read on the internet about the procedure, but wanted to know if anyone can tell their experiences. Most of the info received was just links and general info, no first hand experiences.

The difference between 2nd and 3rd degree burns is that in 3 degree there is nerve damage, so not so much pain. The area effected is his shins. He does have circulatory issues, so blood flow is not as good as it should be. From what I understand that could be an issue.

Anyone who has experience with this we would appreciate some firsthand reports!

Thanks in advance.

It is on the shins.. His feet and legs are always cold. They are waiting for medicare approval.

Its his heart. Thank you.

They were showing some kind of oxygen chamber that speeded up healing.... wish I'd paid more attention. I'll see if I can find it. Seems like it would really be a help.... if what I remember is correct that is!!

Well, he just found out Thursday. You know how slow the American medical system works. I just hoped someone had had this procedure and could shed some light. I appreciate what you have shared. Ill send him over to check out the post. Thanks, Ferret.

espíritu del lago wrote:A friend of mine received 2nd degree burns on his legs. He is not diabetic, he has read on the internet about the procedure, but wanted to know if anyone can tell their experiences. Most of the info received was just links and general info, no first hand experiences.

The difference between 2nd and 3rd degree burns is that in 3 degree there is nerve damage, so not so much pain. The area effected is his shins. He does have circulatory issues, so blood flow is not as good as it should be. From what I understand that could be an issue.

Anyone who has experience with this we would appreciate some firsthand reports!

Thanks in advance.

My first question is why does he need the grafts. The shins are not a flexible area, so scar tissue will not cause a problem with movement unless it is pulling on the skin covering the back. It is also not a huge % of the body. Is it just to make the area heal faster?

I have seen it work with patients even up to 90 years of age with less than perfect circulation. However, it will need attention every day for a while, then every other day or every 3rd day for months (the last patient I saw required 4 months of regular attention afterward). However, this is the same care needed for grafted or ungrafted injuries.

If you are asking how it is done, they will likely take skin from the thigh area. Then either cover the area, or put pieces on it (like pepperoni on a pizza) so they can fuse together (heal the burned area faster).

Is the question to do it or not to do it (let it just heal by scar tissue)? Is he wondering if it will just be a waste of money if he does it? What does he specifially want to know?

ferret wrote:Do you think you might have said that in the initial post? His Cardiologist would be the best one to answer his questions and address his concerns about the chances of the graft working.
Hubby has a very well functioning heart...for him, it's the veins and arteries that are crap and affect his circulation.

Kippy...it's called a Hyperbaric Oxygen Chamber. We tried that too, in PV.

That's it! Thank you!! So..... how did it work for you?

Dr. Sam Thelin wrote:

espíritu del lago wrote:A friend of mine received 2nd degree burns on his legs. He is not diabetic, he has read on the internet about the procedure, but wanted to know if anyone can tell their experiences. Most of the info received was just links and general info, no first hand experiences.

The difference between 2nd and 3rd degree burns is that in 3 degree there is nerve damage, so not so much pain. The area effected is his shins. He does have circulatory issues, so blood flow is not as good as it should be. From what I understand that could be an issue.

Anyone who has experience with this we would appreciate some firsthand reports!

Thanks in advance.

My first question is why does he need the grafts. The shins are not a flexible area, so scar tissue will not cause a problem with movement unless it is pulling on the skin covering the back. It is also not a huge % of the body. Is it just to make the area heal faster?

I have seen it work with patients even up to 90 years of age with less than perfect circulation. However, it will need attention every day for a while, then every other day or every 3rd day for months (the last patient I saw required 4 months of regular attention afterward). However, this is the same care needed for grafted or ungrafted injuries.

If you are asking how it is done, they will likely take skin from the thigh area. Then either cover the area, or put pieces on it (like pepperoni on a pizza) so they can fuse together (heal the burned area faster).

Is the question to do it or not to do it (let it just heal by scar tissue)? Is he wondering if it will just be a waste of money if he does it? What does he specifially want to know?

your answer makes a lot of sense,doc sam. my shins are scarred all to hell but i never considered a skin graft because there ain't no flesh underneath

Sam, thank you....

Is it just to make the area heal faster?

I was not with him, and I assume that is the reason. I will have him ask the Doc Thrus.

Is the question to do it or not to do it (let it just heal by scar tissue)? Is he wondering if it will just be a waste of money if he does it? What does he specifially want to know?

Yes that is what we were discussing. Money is not an issue covered by 1,st medicare, maybe??? If not it will be covered by Tri-care.

Basically, he wants to keep the risk of infection to a minimum! Graft would be another source for infection, however if the graft would be a better option, then so be it.

Thank you Ferret!